John Kerry: Putin’s Useful Climate Idiot

Rupert Darwall at RealClearEnergy

Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine marks the end of the West’s Era of Illusions. Because the global climate crisis was more serious than war, peace, and stability in the international system, it was an era when the West’s elites were obsessed with solving the problem.

Some even believed climate change caused war. Climate change policy was therefore a double national security policy. The annual UN climate talk round at kumbaya for many years represented the apex of international relations.

In a BBC World Service interview, presidential climate envoy John Kerry expressed concern about the amount of greenhouse gas being emitted from the war in Ukraine. Kerry just wanted to get warmed up by a series of platitudes, which show that he is a climate deluded relic and unable to accept the realities that Putin has placed on the planet.

RELATED: Joe Manchin’s Bill to Ban Russian Oil Imports is Opposed by the White House

“Equally importantly,” Kerry complained, “you’re going to lose people’s focus,” as if the first invasion of a sovereign European country since the Second World War is an annoying distraction. Hopefully, Kerry continued, Putin would realize that Russia’s land is thawing, and the people of Russia are at risk.  

Kerry concluded with an expression of pure self-deception, saying he hopes Putin “will help us to stay on track with respect to what we need to do for the climate.” Stay on track? Russia has not hidden its desire to cut its emissions. Russia’s second Nationally Determined Contribution, submitted in November 2020 under the Paris climate agreement, is to limit its 2030 emissions to “no more than 70% of 1990 levels.” The document is careful to avoid pledging to cut or reduce emissions.

The 1990 baseline was before the fall of the heavily inefficient, polluting and centrally planned Soviet economy. Thus, the 70% limit actually enables Russia to increase its emissions by 34% – and that’s before taking account of any changes in forestry and land use that would allow Russia to claim credit for negative emissions. 

Despite Kerry’s claim about the thawing of their frozen north, Russians’ indifference to climate change predates Putin’s rise to power. During preparation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) first assessment report in 1990, Soviet scientists argued that warming might be beneficial at northern latitudes.

Yuri Izrael, the Soviet academician and chair of the IPCC’s working group examining potential impacts of global warming, emphasized the doubt and uncertainty of climate change and disputed claims that it would be harmful. 

At a 2005 conference on avoiding dangerous climate change organized by Britain during its G-8 presidency, Putin’s former economic adviser, Andrei Illarionov, challenged the premise of the conference. “Anyone who is frightened about the prospect of global warming is welcome to come and live in Siberia,” Illarionov told a journalist. 

It is clear that Russian climate scientists are better equipped to understand climate science, and how rising carbon dioxide levels will affect global temperature. In testimony to Congress in 2016, John Christy, the Alabama state climatologist and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, compared 102 climate-model simulations against observed global temperature of the mid-troposphere from satellites and balloons (the troposphere is the lowest layer of the atmosphere, up to a height of around 33,000 feet).

RELATED: Are We Nuts? American Energy Is Key To Undermining Putin’s War

Models warmed the atmosphere on average two-and a half times faster that what actually happened in real life. Russian INMCM4 climate models were the only ones that could produce simulations as close to actual observations. Small wonder Russians are disinclined to believe there’s a climate crisis.  

John Kerry has the greatest ignorance and simplicity when it comes to climate change science. “I can remember from when I was in high school and college, some aspects of science or physics can be tough – chemistry. But this is not tough,” Kerry told an audience of school children in Indonesia in 2014, when he was secretary of state.

“This is simple. Kids at the earliest age can understand this.” The science was “absolutely certain,” Kerry claimed. “Let me give you an example. When an apple separates from a tree, it falls to the ground.” Contrast Kerry’s simplistic analogy with this statement in the IPCC’s third assessment report: “The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible,” the IPCC said in 2001, before it became deeply politicized as it is now.

Kerry and Putin may be in agreement on one thing, however. Two years ago, at a business conference in Moscow, the Russian president denounced fracking as “barbaric,” claiming that fracking technologies “destroy the environment.” A January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment on Russian activities in U.S. elections noted that RT, the Russian state-owned news channel, ran anti-fracking programming that highlighted the alleged environmental and public health harms of the practice.

“This is likely reflective of the Russian Government’s concern about the impact of fracking and US natural gas production on the global energy market and the potential challenges to Gazprom’s [the Russian state-owned energy company] profitability,” the assessment concluded. 

RELATED: Rep. Jim Jordan Says ‘Radical Left’ Won’t Let Biden Reverse ‘Crazy’ Energy Policies

In June 2014, Kerry’s predecessor as secretary of state complained about the impact of Russian money on financing “astroturf” environmental campaigns. “We were up against Russia pushing oligarchs and others to buy media. We were even up against phony environmental groups, and I’m a big environmentalist, but these were funded by the Russians to stand against any effort, ‘Oh that pipeline, that fracking, that whatever will be a problem for you,’ and a lot of the money supporting that message was coming from Russia,” Hillary Clinton said.

Putin recognizes that energy is an important component of American strategic power. John Kerry doesn’t. That is why, to borrow from Lenin, Kerry acts as Putin’s useful climate idiot. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine plunges the world into its gravest emergency since the Cuban missile crisis sixty years ago. This puts in perspective Kerry’s folly when he confuses imaginary crises with actual ones.

Rupert Darwall wrote the book Green Tyranny.

Rupert Darwall, a Senior Fellow at RealClearFoundation is responsible for researching international climate agreements and the integration of corporate governance goals (ESG). His writings have been published in numerous publications, such as The Spectator and Wall Street Journal, National Review, Daily Telegraph, and National Review.

The views expressed by content partners and contributors are not necessarily those of The Political Insider.