Kavanaugh Assassination Plot Draws Muted White House Response

Phil Wegmann at RealClearPolitics

He had both a gun and a knife. In the end, however, the assassin was cold-footed.

It wasn’t just good luck, though, that prevented a tragedy that would have destroyed a family and roiled America’s civic life even further. There was no chance that the armed U.S. Marshals happened to be at precisely the right moment. No, the fact that federal law enforcement were in a position to be “instrumental in this person not accomplishing that horrible deed,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told RealClearPolitics, was due – in no small part – to the diligence of the Biden administration.

“One of the reasons” the plot failed was because the Department of Justice took threats against Kavanaugh’s life “very seriously from the beginning.”

RELATED: DeSantis Rips Media For Sparse Coverage Of Murder Attempt On Justice Kavanaugh

Republicans and Democrats are locked in an endless battle for abortion rights since the very beginning. Roe v. Wade leaked. Leaked documents.

Monday was no exception.

RCP heard Jean-Pierre tell RCP that Biden has already condemned threats to sitting judges. RCP collectively protested. “Democrat leaders, including Joe Biden, have refused to condemn the assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh,” replied Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel in a statement to RCP.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy told RCP in a separate statement, “It’s an outrage that President Biden found the time to appear on a late-night comedy show and predict a ‘mini revolution’ if the Supreme Court doesn’t rule his way on abortion, yet remains silent on the attempted murder of Justice Brett Kavanaugh.”

This raised an immediate question, one that Republicans have happily raised in the press: Does a statement from the president count if he doesn’t actually say the words himself?

The president didn’t bring up the assassination plot during his interview with ABC late-night host Jimmy Kimmel last Wednesday. He didn’t work that topic into a speech about inflation two days later, either, though he managed to preface those same Friday remarks by denouncing the Jan. 6 riots as “a brutal assault on our democracy.” Biden spoke publicly this week, but again, nothing about Kavanaugh on Monday.

And yet, the same day the plot was foiled, Jean-Pierre was explicit.

“The president condemns the actions of this individual in the strongest terms and is grateful to law enforcement for quickly taking him into custody,” the president’s spokeswoman told reporters aboard Air Force One. “As the president has consistently made clear, public officials, including judges, must be able to do their jobs without concern for their personal safety or that of their families. Any threats to violence or intimidation of justices are not allowed in this society. He has said that himself, and we have been forceful from the podium many times.”

RELATED : House Democrats Stalled Bill For Extra Security For Supreme Court Justices And Their Families

These are still ongoing discussions about the condemnation of which political violence and to what extent. As are the threats. The day after law enforcement took the would-be Kavanaugh assassin into custody, the Jan. 6 committee held its first prime-time hearing on last year’s breach of the U.S. Capitol.

Taken together, the two events would neatly encapsulate the current era of discord – that is, if political violence didn’t continue to make headlines.

Gresham’s crisis pregnancy center, in Oregon was caught on fire this weekend. “If abortions aren’t safe,” the arsonists scrawled on the walls before setting the blaze, “then neither are you.” The centers staffed by anti-abortion volunteers often provide resources for women facing unplanned pregnancies, such as adoption counseling and maternal care. Three other centers in Illinois, New York, and Wisconsin were also targets of arson this year.

“We have seen an uptick of that type of arson and bombing, or attempt to bomb, as we saw just recently over the weekend,” Jean-Pierre told RCP, adding that the administration takes such attacks “very seriously” and that they were “something clearly the DOJ is looking into.”

It is not clear whether protestors should picket judges’ homes to try to affect pending cases. The pro-abortion group Ruth Sent Us posted a map of conservative justices’ residences, and a steady stream of activists have subsequently set up shop there since early last month. Later, the assassin who was stopped by authorities claimed that he discovered the Kavanaugh family’s address online.

Asked if the president condoned that kind of protest, Jean-Pierre told RCP on Monday, “We have not weighed in on where people should or should not protest.”

“We have said that all Americans have the right to peacefully protest, whatever their point of view,” she added, “but that attempts at intimidation and violence are totally unacceptable, and that they need to be condemned anytime they happen, regardless of who does it.”

Despite warnings from Republicans about unintended consequences the White House continues to be adamant. Did seem to have something for you at least tacit endorsement of demonstrating at the homes of conservative justices, a form of protest banned by federal law. Jen Psaki, the former White House press secretary, told reporters on May 10 that “the protests outside of judge’s houses have not turned violent,” adding that “just because people are passionate, it does not mean they are violent.”

RELATED: Flashback: Video Shows Chuck Schumer Threatening That Brett Kavanaugh Will ‘Pay the Price’

“I know that there’s an outrage right now, I guess, about protests that have been peaceful to date – and we certainly continue to encourage that – outside of judges’ homes. And that’s the president’s position,” Psaki said at that same briefing. In the Administration’s view, it was hypocritical of Republicans to say nothing about school board protests, while raising alarm about Supreme Court protests. She said, “The silence is pretty deafening.”

The law appears to be black and white. Per Section 1507 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, it is illegal to protest outside a “residence occupied or used by a judge” if the expressed intent is “interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice.” Activists are undeterred. “Don’t like me at your house?” read the sign of one picketer, “Stay out of my uterus.”

Congress passed legislation that would increase the security of Supreme Court justices, their families and to match the protections received by other top-ranking executives. Jean-Pierre informed RCP that Biden supported such legislation. The Senate unanimously approved the bill May 9. Minority Leader McCarthy, however, blasted House Speaker Pelosi for her inaction on that bill, “which she had blocked three times.”

Pelosi assured reporters that justices have been protected since May and are under 24/7 surveillance. “Nobody is in danger over the weekend,” she said last Thursday, “because of our not having a bill.”

Real Clear Wire permission granted permission for this syndicated article.

The views expressed by content partners and contributors are not necessarily those of The Political Insider.