Trump Wants Clinton-Appointed Judge Recused From $100 Million Racketeering Lawsuit Against Hillary

Lawyers for Donald Trump are moving forward with a lawsuit of $100 million against Hillary Clinton. They also requested that the judge in the case be removed from the courtroom because he was appointed by President Bill Clinton.

Trump filed the suit alleging that Clinton and his political associates participated in a racketeering plot. He also claimed that Trump colluded with Russian officials during 2016.

RELATED: Swimming Against The Tide. Disney takes wakefulness to a new level

It’s a coincidence?

Lawyers for Donald Trump, Alina Habba and Peter Ticktin argue that Bill Clinton-appointed Judge Donald Middlebrooks could be biased based on his being appointed by the defendant’s husband.

Habba & Ticktin have filed this motion in Part:

“There is no question that Judge’s [sic] Middlebrooks’ impartiality would be questioned by a disinterested observer, fully informed of the facts, due to Judge’s relationship with the Defendant, either, individually, or by the very nature of his appointment to the Federal Bench, by the Defendant’s husband.

It is important that justice be done and that it appears to be being done. This could not be more important in a case like the above styled cause, where wrongs in regard to a presidential election are to be redressed.”

Judges, at minimum, are appointed for agreeing with the presidency’s philosophies.

This is the next step:

“Moreover, the Plaintiff is unaware of the exact extent of the relationship between Judge Middlebrooks and the Defendant, HILLARY CLINTON, herself, who acted as First Lady of the United States, during the time of the Judge’s nomination to Federal Court Judge. Also, the Plaintiff does not know if the Judge is currently employed. [sic] relationship with either the Defendant, HILLARY CLINTON, or her husband, and how far back the relationship has existed.”

RELATED: Dallas Fed: Global Recession ‘Seems Unavoidable’ If Russian Sanctions Continue

Nature Of The Suit

This suit was filed in March and seeks damages amounting to approximately $100 million. It alleges that Clinton and the others are accused of having “maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that … Trump was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty.”

It also states that the alleged conspiracy ultimately resulted in “an unthinkable plot – one that shocks the conscience and is an affront to this nation’s democracy.” Others named in the lawsuit include the Democrat National Committee (DNC), former FBI director James Comey, former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, and current National Security Advisor for the Biden administration Jake Sullivan.

The suit also names Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence agent, as the plaintiff. It is believed that the document helped to kick off Russiagate.

RELATED: Biden Wants $2.6 Billion For ‘Gender Equity’ Worldwide

Hillary has more problems

As if this was not enough bad news for team Hillary, the Federal Election Commission recently fined Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the DNC for improper campaign finance disclosures.

For failing to report payments related to the Steele dossier, the DNC received $105,000 while the Clinton Campaign was given 8,000.

The fine was issued because the Clinton campaign was dishonest about the financing of the dossier, “claiming it was for legal services, not opposition research.” 

The Clinton Campaign and DNC have both denied wrongdoing. However, the DNC fine will play an important role in the racketeering suit.