Emory Law Journal Refuses To Publish Conservative Professor’s Dismissal of Systemic Racism

Lawrence Alexander, a Professor at the University of San Diego School of Law. His co-authorship of the infamous article is what makes him famous. The Philadelphia Inquirer Amy Wax (University of Pennsylvania) argued that America’s decline in “bourgeois values” was due to various adverse social developments. These were their words:

That culture laid out the script we all were supposed to follow: Get married before you have children and strive to stay married for their sake. Work hard and get the education that you require to be a successful worker. Do your best for the client or employer. Serve the country by being a patriot. Do your best to be neighborly and civic-minded. Avoid coarse language in public. Respect authority. Abstain from substance abuse or crime.

From the 1940’s through the 1960s, these cultural precepts ruled. These precepts could be adhered to by anyone, regardless of their background or ability. This is especially true when they are backed up with almost universal approval. The productivity, education gains and social coherence that occurred during this period were largely due to adhesion.

The essay caused a lot of controversy and led to many other controversies about Wax. Recently, Wax was charged with racism for stating that Asian immigration needs to be curtailed. She stated that this is because many Asian immigrants support Democrats.  She was already barred from her university’s class. It is against academic freedom and fundamental principles.

Alexander now faces an even greater violation of fundamental principles of academic freedom. He was asked recently by the Emory Law Journal—a publication of Emory University’s law school—to contribute to a “festschrift” on the works of Michael Perry, an Emory law professor. A festschrift refers to a group of writings meant to honour a specific scholar.

Alexander did indeed criticize Perry’s work in disparate racial impacts and equal protection. It is what I focus on, and not where Michael picks a bone.
Alexander wrote that Alexander’s impressive work is not because of his errors in the early work. However, Alexander pointed out that there was an analog in current political discourse that makes Alexander’s error of many decades past relevant.

The author writes conservatively and is undoubtedly more liberal than the editors. Emory Law JournalThey disagree. The authors did more than just express disagreement, but they also decided to publish the article. They informed Alexander that Alexander’s essay was racist. Alexander would need to have it substantially revised.

Danielle Kerker Goldstein was the editor-in-chief. “We are concerned with your discussion on systemic racism. We find your words hurtful. The essay contains a number of instances of inappropriate language usage, including the use of the objectifying word ‘blacks,’ which is used on several pages (pages 3, 6, 8, and 8).The discussion on crime and heredity (pages 11, 14 and 18), and the unquoted statement that “thankfully racism isn’t an issue today” (page 18). The most important thing is that the topic of racism does not have a strong connection to your comment on Professor Perry’s work. That is the Issue’s focus and the reason for the publication.

Kerker Goldstein declined to comment on a request.

The essay is available for readers to view and make their own judgments. Even though I can only speak for myself, it is difficult to agree that the language used in this essay is insensitive or objectifying. Alexander refers to blacks and whites, but also to both. Alexander invokes heredity and criminality to put aside the issue. Perry’s views regarding racism are relevant.

Alexander declined to alter the article. He said, “I wrote about the racial situations in the U.S. Today.” Reason. The editors rejected my ideas and decided not to publish them despite me being invited to submit them for their festschrift issues.

Alexander’s treatment by the journal prompted two others to withdraw their submissions. Festschrifts are meant to reflect a variety of views on Perry. To exclude Alexander from the discussion undermines its validity.

Gail Heriot wrote, “This opera doesn’t end,” and was a Professor of Law at University of San Diego Law School. She also contributed to The Opera. Volokh Conspiracy This website hosts the document. The essays were withdrawn by two law professors (one liberal and one conservative) from the website. ELJProtest against the treatment of Larry. Another professor, who I consider to be left-of-center, has stated they will only publish essays if it is possible to include a short blurb that protests Larry’s decision to not publish them. These professors do not agree with Larry’s essay. He can stand up for himself, but it doesn’t mean that they have to agree.

You can read Heriot’s article right here.