The New York Times Spreads Misinformation About COVID-19 –

The purported risk of social media has emerged as soon as once more as a high concern of senators, whistleblowers, and members of the press. They’re very, very frightened about Fb fanning the flames of hate, compromising U.S. democracy, and spreading COVID misinformation.

What number of of them are frightened concerning the COVID misinformation being unfold by The New York Occasions?

The paper of document needed to print a prolonged correction to a giant error in a Thursday information article. The story was about different international locations’ approaches to vaccinating younger individuals, and whether or not one shot could be higher than two given the dangers of coronary heart irritation in youngsters. The article wrongly claimed that just about a million U.S. youngsters—900,000 to be exact—had been hospitalized with COVID-19 for the reason that begin of the pandemic.

The precise quantity? About 63,000 since August 2020, when stats first grew to become obtainable.

And whereas that was the largest error, it wasn’t the only mistake within the story. In accordance with the correction, the reporter “described incorrectly the actions taken by regulators in Sweden and Denmark” and misstated the timing of a vital Meals and Drug Administration assembly.

This wasn’t a junior reporter new to the job. The writer was the paper’s lead coronavirus correspondent, Apoorva Mandavilli. (Her bio, which notes that she received the Victor Cohn Prize for Excellence in Medical Science Reporting in 2019, seems beneath the correction.)

This is not Mandavilli’s first questionable article. In early August, FiveThirtyEight‘s Nate Silver accused her of framing the Provincetown research of the delta variant’s unfold in a “deceptive and sensationalist approach.”

Mandavilli additionally tweeted, as lately as Could of 2021, that the lab leak idea of COVID-19’s origins is “racist” at its roots. She finally deleted that tweet however doubled down on the sentiment.

Typically, her pandemic reporting has manifested a paranoid slant. However the Thursday article wasn’t simply slanted; it was mistaken, mistaken, mistaken.

Congress will not be prone to name Mandavilli earlier than a listening to to reply questions concerning the risk posed by the Occasions deceptive its readers. Folks typically settle for that conventional media get issues mistaken among the time, and even lots of the time. And certainly, it could be mistaken—morally, constitutionally, and virtually—for the federal authorities to attempt to clamp down on misinformation within the mainstream media. That’s exactly what the First Modification exists to ban. Fb’s attain could also be bigger than The New York Occasions‘, however the precept will not be all that totally different.

For extra on this topic, take a look at my new ebook Tech Panic (right here) or my monologue from in the present day’s episode of Rising (under):